Former Australian Foreign Minister Gareth Evans has called on his country to "get out of the hole" into which it has dug itself with China. 

In a recent article published on "Pearls and Irritations," a specialist blog focusing on policy development, Evans, who was the Australian minister for foreign affairs between 1988 and 1996, pointed out four key failures of Australia in managing its relationship with China. 

"The first is ... too much tone-deaf stridency in our language, starting with the way Malcolm Turnbull introduced the undue influence legislation in 2017; too much over the top behavior, as in the ASIO/AFP raids on Chinese journalists", and too much unchecked offensiveness in parliamentary performances, he wrote. 

The second point, as he mentioned, is the failure to fully factor in the risks of "not only irritating but hurting China, as we have done in not just joining but leading the international charge on Huawei, tough foreign investment restrictions and foreign influence laws." 

He then talked about Australia's stands, too many of which "have played all too readily into the United States 'deputy sheriff' narrative." 

The last point was the "insufficient recognition that there is not a lot of downside for China in getting stuck into Australia." 

"China may like our coal, and agricultural products, and to have Australia as a student and tourist destination, but it does not need us for any of them," Evans wrote. 

He then moved on to suggestions of how to get out of the hole, including "stop digging" and "moderate the official language." 

"...our leaders should make absolutely clear, when we take a negative position on anything to do with China, that this is a matter of independent national judgment and not of looking over our shoulder for guidance from our own imperial masters," Evans said. 

The next point was that Australia should acknowledge the legitimacy and inevitability of some of China's international aspirations as well as commercial concerns. 

Finally he called on the Australian government to find issues on which there is common ground. "In areas like on climate, nuclear weapons, peacekeeping, counter-terrorism, arms control and -- for the most part -- response to pandemics, it (China) has played a more interested, constructive and potentially cooperative role than has generally been recognized," said Evans. 

Colin Mackerras, an Australian specialist on Chinese history, theater, minority nationalities and a former English teacher at the Beijing Foreign Studies University (1964-1966), said he "cannot see how the deteriorating relations with what is still our largest trading partner (China) serves Australia's interests in any way." 

In an article titled Bad relations with China are not in Australia's interests published on "Pearls and Irritations," Mackerras said that it was "unnecessary and provocative, even self-righteous, for Australia" to lead the insistence on an enquiry into the origin and spread of the coronavirus. 

Speaking of the cartoon Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian tweeted, Mackerras said "considering the Brereton Report acknowledged happenings similar to what the tweet suggested, it was no more insensitive than our implicit accusation of China's treachery in starting the pandemic." 

It's like saying, "you are hypocritical, you lecture us about human rights abuses, but are guilty yourself," he went on. 

Dennis Argall, former Australia's Ambassador to China from 1984 until 1985, said that "the rage of a prime minister against a modest ranking cartoonist in a foreign government is foolish for a number of reasons." 

He made the remarks in a story titled Ending permanent war, ending hatred of China in the same journal. 

"It is in the first instance folly for the person at highest level to go into combat with a much lower level person, leaving no room to escalate discussion in the direction of peace or war. In the second instance it is folly because, as John Menadue has pointed out, the Chinese cartoonist has read more of the Brereton Report than have those yelling at him. Third, it reflects a lack of strategic vision," he said. 

(With input from Xinhua)