Why China's decision to welcome foreign healthcare investors matters

Editor's note: Matteo Giovannini, a special commentator on current affairs for CGTN, is a finance professional at the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and a non-resident associate fellow at the Center for China and Globalization. The article reflects the author's views and not necessarily those of CGTN.

Chinese modernization in the healthcare sector has been marked by substantial progress, driven by government reforms, technological innovation, and an expanding healthcare infrastructure. The transition from a basic, collectivized healthcare model to a more advanced and equitable system reflects the broader economic and social transformation that the country has experienced over several decades.

On September 8, a joint circular from the Ministry of Commerce, National Health Commission and the National Medical Products Administration announced plans to allow foreign investors to run hospitals in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Nanjing, Suzhou, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, as well as the whole island of Hainan. The circular, however, stresses that foreign investors will not be allowed to acquire public hospitals or operate businesses associated with traditional Chinese medicine.

The decision to allow wholly foreign-owned hospitals in key cities and regions fits well with the goals of Healthy China 2030, a strategic plan aimed at expanding the spectrum of healthcare services, promoting healthier lifestyles, and creating a robust healthcare system by 2030.

The move marks a significant shift in the nation's healthcare landscape. As the world's second-largest economy and home to a rapidly aging population, China's healthcare system has faced immense pressure in recent years. By opening the doors to foreign healthcare providers, the government is making a bold and strategic move that could potentially reshape not just the healthcare sector but the entire investment climate.

The benefits of this policy are clear. For years, Chinese citizens with the means to do so have been traveling abroad in search of medical treatment. Countries such as the U.S., Japan, and Germany have been prime destinations for those seeking specialized care, state-of-the-art medical technologies, or services that may not yet be widely available at home. Allowing foreign hospitals to set up wholly-owned facilities locally addresses this issue head-on by offering access to world-class healthcare without the need for costly international travel. It also encourages foreign medical institutions to bring cutting-edge treatment options directly to the Chinese people.

Moreover, the move reflects China's broader efforts to modernize and reform its healthcare system, which has been burdened by inefficiencies, overcapacity in public hospitals and regional disparities in the quality of care. Allowing foreign hospitals into major urban centers like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen is an acknowledgment that global expertise can play a critical role in filling the gaps in China's healthcare infrastructure. It paves the way for healthy competition between domestic and international providers, which could push local hospitals to improve their standards.

Foreign hospitals will also bring advanced healthcare management models, modern operational systems, and new methods of patient care which could benefit Chinese medical professionals and institutions. This cross-pollination of ideas will likely elevate the overall healthcare standard in China, making it more competitive on a global scale.

However, this policy change is not without its challenges. The introduction of foreign-owned hospitals could intensify competition, especially for top-tier hospitals in China's largest cities, which already attract the bulk of elite medical talent.

There is also the question of affordability. Will these foreign hospitals cater primarily to wealthy Chinese or expatriates, leaving the average citizen with limited access to high-end healthcare? If foreign hospitals are positioned as luxury providers, they could deepen the existing inequality in healthcare access, leaving public hospitals even more strained as they continue to serve the majority of the population.

Further, Chinese authorities will need to navigate the regulatory aspects carefully. Ensuring that foreign hospitals adhere to local laws, health standards, and ethical considerations is vital to maintaining public trust and safety. Striking the right balance between regulatory oversight and providing enough flexibility for these hospitals to innovate will be key to the policy's success.

In the context of broader economic policy, allowing wholly foreign-owned hospitals is also a signal that China remains committed to opening up its markets, even as the global geopolitical environment grows more complex. It demonstrates that China recognizes the value of foreign expertise and investment, not just in manufacturing or technology but in areas that directly affect people's daily lives.

This policy, while seemingly focused on healthcare, has the potential to spark further reforms in other sectors, from pharmaceuticals to medical technology. It could also create opportunities for collaboration between domestic and international players in other areas including research, medical education, and telemedicine.

Ultimately, China's decision to allow wholly-owned foreign hospitals is a bold and timely step in addressing its healthcare challenges. It's a move that could bring immediate benefits in terms of quality and access, but one that must be managed carefully to ensure it serves not only the wealthy but all sections of the population. If executed thoughtfully, this could be a pivotal moment in China's journey toward a more open, modern, and equitable healthcare system, one that might, in time, become a model for other developing nations facing similar healthcare challenges.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)