DeepSeek recalibrates global innovation

Editor's note: Andy Mok, a special commentator on current affairs for CGTN, is a senior research fellow at the Center for China and Globalization. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

In an era long dominated by Western tech giants, the meteoric rise of DeepSeek – a generative artificial intelligence (AI) developed by Chinese innovators – has shattered entrenched paradigms and redefined our collective understanding.

By delivering performance on par with elite models like ChatGPT at a mere fraction of the cost, DeepSeek disrupts the long-held AI dogma that advanced systems must be exclusive, proprietary and prohibitively expensive.

Its breakthrough also challenges American conceptions of democracy and free markets as the sole engines of innovation and progress.

In addition, DeepSeek exemplifies China's broader vision to provide global public goods – a model that reimagines technology as a universal resource for the benefit of all.

These shifts signal not merely a technological leap but a profound epistemological, ideological and ethical revolution.

The revolution DeepSeek has ignited in AI is fundamentally epistemological. The dominant narrative in AI maintains that cutting-edge systems require immense investment, proprietary algorithms and secrecy – equating excellence with exclusivity. DeepSeek debunks this myth by achieving elite performance with a lean, cost-effective model. Its emergence is reminiscent of the Copernican Revolution, which upended the geocentric view and placed the sun at the center of our solar system, forcing humanity to rethink its place in the cosmos.

Just as Copernicus reconfigured our understanding of the universe, DeepSeek compels the tech community to reexamine the belief that advanced AI must be an expensive privilege. This urges us to value efficiency and accessibility as the true hallmarks of progress.

At the same time, DeepSeek's breakthrough deals a severe blow to American ideological dogma. For too long, the United States has promoted the idea that its model of democracy and free markets is uniquely capable of driving innovation. Yet the surge of transformative technologies – from TikTok's global cultural impact to the rapid rise of non-Western electric vehicle industries – shows that creativity and disruption are no longer the exclusive preserve of American systems.

DeepSeek's success exposes the fragility of the narrative that only the American model, with its emphasis on individualism and laissez-faire economics, can foster progress. This is not to deny that other nations have vibrant democratic traditions; rather, it highlights that alternative governance frameworks and state-driven support can equally fuel technological breakthroughs in a multipolar world.

Beyond these challenges to conventional wisdom, DeepSeek embodies China's ambitious vision to provide global public goods. Unlike models that hoard innovation as a competitive asset, China's approach – exemplified by DeepSeek – is to disseminate technology for the collective benefit. By open sourcing its offerings, DeepSeek is set to catalyze a wave of innovation worldwide, particularly among developing nations and the Global South.

This transformation aligns with the counterintuitive wisdom of the Jevons Paradox, that as a resource becomes more efficient and accessible, its overall consumption and impact often increase rather than diminish. In simple terms, when advanced AI is no longer a costly luxury but a widely available tool, its applications – and the benefits they bring – will multiply exponentially. This shift promises to level the technological playing field and empower communities across the globe.

A pivotal facet of DeepSeek's story is its origin in China's premier academic institutions. It is largely the brainchild of Tsinghua and Peking University graduates, innovators who benefit from one of the world's most rigorous education systems. Steeped in traditional Chinese values emphasizing discipline, perseverance and collective advancement, they are nurtured by a long-term government strategy to cultivate homegrown talent.

In stark contrast to many Western institutions that overemphasize individualism, China's model fuses academic rigor with a commitment to societal progress. This synthesis of elite training, cultural heritage and state support proves that truly world-class innovation can thrive beyond the Western paradigm.

DeepSeek's rapid rise has triggered geopolitical reactions from established powers. Cyber attacks, national security probes, export control warnings and coordinated encirclement measures reveal a defensive stance driven by fears of losing both technological and ideological supremacy.

For Washington, DeepSeek poses an alleged existential threat, prompting attempts to prevent a paradigm shift that could undermine its longstanding dominance in innovation and narrative control. Yet such measures risk stifling the spirit of innovation they claim to defend. The struggle surrounding DeepSeek clearly underscores that modern tech conflicts extend beyond hardware and software, centering equally on ideas, values and the global balance of power.

The rise of DeepSeek marks a watershed moment that is rewriting global innovation. It shatters the dogma that advanced AI must be expensive and secret, challenging the American belief that only free markets and liberal democracy drive progress. By harnessing open-source innovation and the dynamics of the Jevons Paradox, DeepSeek exemplifies China's vision of global public goods, democratizing technological benefits worldwide.

Propelled by elite homegrown talent, China's breakthrough signals a recalibration of global innovation. Outdated paradigms are crumbling, paving the way for a more inclusive future where innovation becomes a universal public good, benefiting all societies and redefining the very foundation of progress.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on Twitter to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)