U.S. government shutdown: The human face of a political stalemate

Editor's note:Jessica Durdu, a special commentator on current affairs for CGTN, is a foreign affairs specialist and PhD candidate in international relations at China Foreign Affairs University. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

The shutdown of the U.S. federal government this week marks the first such event in nearly seven years. Rooted in partisan divisions that prevented Congress from passing a funding bill, the shutdown illustrates the recurring fragility of budgetary politics in Washington. While debates often center on high-level political maneuvering, the real impact is felt by federal employees, ordinary citizens, and the broader economy.

Government shutdowns in the U.S. are not unprecedented. Since the modern budget process was established in 1976, the federal government has experienced more than 20 funding gaps of varying length and severity. Perhaps the most widely remembered in recent history is the 35-day shutdown of 2018-2019, the longest in U.S. history. At its peak, around 800,000 federal workers were either furloughed or forced to work without pay, with ripple effects extending to airport security lines, food inspections, and even mortgage applications. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the shutdown shaved an estimated $11 billion off U.S. GDP, nearly $3 billion of which was never recovered, illustrating the tangible economic cost of political gridlock.

The underlying cause of such shutdowns is the inability of Congress and the executive branch to reconcile differences in federal spending priorities. The American system of checks and balances, while designed to prevent unilateral decision-making, occasionally produces deadlock when ideological divides run deep. Budget negotiations have frequently become proxy battles for broader ideological conflicts, whether over healthcare, immigration, or fiscal austerity. In this sense, shutdowns are less about technical failures in governance than about symbolic struggles over national direction.

The current crisis reflects similar dynamics. Partisan disagreement has once again transformed the budget into a political bargaining chip, leaving federal agencies underfunded and ordinary workers caught in the crossfire. Hundreds of thousands of employees now face unpaid leave, creating financial insecurity that compounds the stress of rising living costs in the U.S.

In past shutdowns, surveys revealed that nearly 80 percent of federal employees lived paycheck to paycheck, which meant even a two-week disruption forced many into debt or delayed bill payments. Beyond personal hardship, the ripple effects threaten the provision of basic public services. Passport offices, tax refund processing, and national parks may experience delays or closures, inconveniencing citizens who rely on government efficiency for routine tasks.

Moreover, the suspension of certain statistical agencies during shutdowns introduces additional complications for financial markets and policymakers. For example, during the 2019 shutdown, the Bureau of Economic Analysis delayed the release of critical GDP data, while the Department of Agriculture postponed updates that farmers use to guide their planting and sales decisions. With the current shutdown, analysts warn that a delay in employment figures or inflation statistics could affect decisions at the Federal Reserve, which has raised interest rates 11 times from March 2022 to July 2023 in response to inflationary pressures. In an interconnected global economy, uncertainty within the U.S. reverberates far beyond its borders, contributing to volatility in markets already navigating inflationary pressures and geopolitical tensions.

It is also important to recognize the symbolic dimension of such crises. For many Americans, repeated shutdowns erode public trust in the capacity of institutions to deliver stability. In political theory, the state's legitimacy rests not only on its ability to enforce laws but also on its provision of predictable and reliable services. A government that periodically halts its own operations risks undermining citizens' faith in the social contract. A Pew Research Center survey conducted after the 2019 shutdown found that two-thirds of Americans have low confidence in the federal government, a decline that highlights how repeated crises reinforce disillusionment.

From a global perspective, the spectacle of the world's largest economy halting its own governance has significant implications. Allies and rivals alike observe these episodes as signs of political dysfunction, raising questions about Washington's capacity to act as a reliable partner on the international stage. In contrast, other advanced economies, despite facing their own challenges, rarely experience such extreme disruptions in government functioning. For instance, during the eurozone crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic, European states endured severe economic stress but did not suspend the operations of their public services due to legislative impasses. This comparison underscores the uniqueness of the American shutdown phenomenon and highlights its costs to both domestic resilience and international credibility.

At the human level, however, the consequences remain the most pressing. The stories of federal workers struggling to pay rent during past shutdowns, or of families forced to delay travel and medical arrangements due to suspended services, put a human face on an otherwise abstract political standoff. These disruptions are not simply numbers on a balance sheet; they serve as a reminder that governance is ultimately about ensuring continuity and stability for citizens.

Ultimately, the lesson from both history and the current crisis is clear: While government shutdowns may reflect the vibrancy and contestation inherent in democratic systems, they also carry profound human and economic costs. The challenge for U.S. policymakers is to reconcile the demands of political debate with the responsibility of governance, ensuring that ordinary people do not bear the brunt of institutional deadlock.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)