U.S. shutdown a symptom of broader erosion

Editor's note: CGTN's First Voice provides instant commentary on breaking stories. The column clarifies emerging issues and better defines the news agenda, offering a Chinese perspective on the latest global events.

The government shutdown is on the verge of becoming the longest in U.S. history.

This is not because the money runs dry, but because the politics surrounding the money have grown so intractable that even essential governance becomes hostage to partisan signaling.

When funding lapses drag on, a democracy's strongest tool, its ability to deliver predictable, steady services to the American people, becomes a casualty.

When the cost of conceding, even a modest amount on a domestic program or defense discretionary line, appears to be a victory for the opposing side, the incentive to concede evaporates. The result is a paradox: More time spent negotiating yields fewer tangible concessions, producing a feedback loop that prolongs the deadlock and expands the human, economic, and moral costs.

The human toll is both immediate and insidious. Federal workers face income uncertainty, with some furloughed and others required to work without guaranteed back pay.

More than 10,000 federal workers, according to White House Budget Director Russell Vought, could lose their jobs because of the shutdown. This creates personal financial strain, stress, and a chilling effect on consumer spending, which in turn dampens local economies.

The shutdown disrupts programs that millions rely on, including nutrition assistance, housing support, health-care subsidies, and research funding, eroding the social safety net just when it is most needed. Around 42 million Americans who rely on food stamps to buy daily necessities now receive reduced aid as a result of the shutdown.

Economic costs extend beyond the payroll line. GDP growth can slow as government-led procurement, permitting processes, and regulatory approvals grind to a halt or slow to a trickle. When public sector activity shrinks, small businesses, many of them reliant on federal contracts or grant funding, feel the bite first.

The lag effects accumulate: Delayed tax processing, postponed infrastructure commitments, and deferred research can reduce productivity and innovation at precisely the moment when resilience and competitiveness are most needed.

In international markets, persistent uncertainty about the U.S. political climate can affect investment decisions and funding flows, with ripple effects in exchange rates and global capital allocation. The shutdown, according to the Congressional Budget Office, could cost the U.S. economy between $7 billion and $14 billion, shaving up to 2 percent from GDP in the fourth quarter.

Worse still, repeated shutdowns risk normalizing dysfunction as a feature rather than an aberration. When crises become recurring fixtures, the public learns to tolerate or ignore evidence of governance failure. The political system’s reflex to use a shutdown for leverage rather than to avert it through pre-agreed mechanisms weakens the normative expectation of timely, principled operations.

Governance exists to secure the common good and to shield citizens from the volatility of political theater. The government’s legitimacy rests on its capacity to fulfill basic duties. When millions face interrupted services, delayed benefits, and uncertainties about their economic futures, citizens will eventually question the competence and reliability of their institutions.

U.S. government shutdown is less a story about money than about governance: Whether the political system can translate disagreement into timely, stable governance. The costs – economic drag, delayed services, diminished trust, and moral injury to citizens who depend on a functioning government – demand a recalibration of how budget battles are fought and resolved.

The length of this shutdown is a symptom of broader erosion: a political system increasingly adept at yielding to brinkmanship, yet woefully ill-equipped to absorb the costs of prolonged stalemate.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on Twitter to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)