The elevated significance of the global governance initiative

Editor's note: CGTN's First Voice provides instant commentary on breaking stories. The column clarifies emerging issues and better defines the news agenda, offering a Chinese perspective on the latest global events.

The dawn of 2026 finds a world already buckling under the weight of protracted crises. The conflict in Ukraine grinds on, and global supply chains remain fragile arteries of a strained economic body. To this volatile mix, we have now witnessed dangerous new escalations: the United States bombarded Venezuela, forcibly seized its leader and made similar threats against a few other Latin American countries. It also withdrew from dozens of international bodies and UN agencies.

The U.S. attack on Venezuela has sent shockwaves through the international community, particularly across the nations of the Global South. Governments have voiced strong objections. Leaders from Brazil, Chile, Mexico and other Latin American states condemned the U.S. military action as a violation of Venezuelan sovereignty and international law, urging peaceful resolution and respect for the will of the Venezuelan people. International institutions such as the United Nations Human Rights Office warned that such unilateral use of force undermines the very foundations of global security and the rule of law.

The U.S. withdrawl from international organizations and UN agencies received criticism from both within and outside America, with analysts pointing out that Washington only wants international cooperation when such cooperation is convenient for its own agenda.

These reactions underscore a broader frustration with unilateral interventionism and resonate with long-standing calls from many developing countries for a more equitable and just international order. In this context, the significance of China's Global Governance Initiative (GGI) becomes ever more potent, with its five core concepts as direct responses to the essential flaws in today's global governance architecture.

The first and most foundational concept is staying committed to sovereign equality. This principle holds that all countries, regardless of size, strength or wealth, should have their sovereignty respected, their domestic affairs free from external interference, and an equal right to participate in and benefit from global governance. In a world where powerful actors can project force across borders, often with scant regard for the territorial integrity of others, reaffirming sovereign equality is more than idealistic — it is essential to prevent a slide into a "law of the strongest."

Second, the GGI emphasizes international rule of law as the fundamental safeguard for the global order. This means unwavering respect for the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and the equal and uniform application of international law without double standards or imposition. The global reaction to the Venezuela intervention — from Latin American presidencies to the UN rights office — reflects exactly this demand for rules, not raw power, to govern relations among states.

Third, multilateralism is enshrined as the basic pathway for global governance. The GGI calls for cooperation and dialogue, rejects unilateralism, and insists that global affairs be decided by all, not by a handful of powerful actors. In an era of intersecting transnational crises — from pandemics to climate change — effective solutions cannot be crafted in isolation or imposed top-down; they require inclusive platforms like the UN and other multilateral institutions.

Fourth, the people-centered approach recognizes that governance should ultimately serve human well-being, not abstract geopolitical scoring. This principle stresses that international cooperation must address poverty, inequality, health, and security in ways that tangibly improve ordinary lives. It calls for closing the gap between the North and the South so that all nations can benefit from the progresses of our time.

Finally, the GGI insists on real results — emphasizing coordinated, outcome-oriented action. This pragmatic focus seeks to bridge the gap between lofty commitments and on-the-ground impact, from digital governance to climate cooperation. In a fractured world, promises without delivery deepen skepticism; and results that directly benefit people bolster confidence in collective institutions.

In a world teetering between order and chaos, the GGI is more than a diplomatic proposal; it is a lifeline for global governance reform. By centering equality, law, cooperation, people, and results, the GGI offers a roadmap for a more just and stable world. As nations rally to defend the principles the GGI embodies, its significance will only grow, proving that China's vision of global governance is not just necessary, but indispensable for humanity's shared future.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)