Editor's note: Hannan Hussain, a special commentator on current affairs for CGTN, is co-founder of Initiate Futures, an Islamabad-based policy think tank. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

China's Ministry of Commerce expressed opposition to the US on Monday for launching so-called Section 301 investigations into dozens of economies, including China, under the flimsy premise that these countries were importing goods produced with "forced labor." Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 – part of an investigative instrument that has been used to advance politically motivated probes in the past – raises serious credibility concerns and lacks factual grounding. With Beijing taking a principled position by inviting Washington to engage in dialogue and consultation to resolve meaningful differences, here is why the probe warrants careful scrutiny.

First, Section 301 is less about forced labor and more about the exercise of unwarranted US influence to challenge the international trade order. Look no further than the fact that Washington used a similar Section 301 investigation on March 11 across over a dozen economies – including China – to push allegations of "overcapacity." These interests run counter to the consultative, results-oriented nature of economic negotiations, which can inform the trajectory of China-US trade engagement.

This includes recent, high-level engagement in Paris led by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Previous rounds of talks last year set these discussions in motion, with China's trade with the US accounting for nearly 9% of the country's total foreign trade value. Washington's trade engagement with China also helps sustain over 530,000 jobs in the United States, underlining the need to sustain hard-won goodwill and support a stable, equitable and nondiscriminatory business climate that benefits both sides.

The latest Section 301 investigation is "a mistake on top of another, which severely undermines the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains and seriously disrupts the international economic and trade order," according to a recent statement by China's Ministry of Commerce.

Options for coordinating expectations are well within sight. The Paris talks provide fertile ground for both China and the US to advance the spirit of the high-level consensus reached between Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump. Issues of mutual concern – rather than preconceived notions about what could qualify as "forced labor" or "overcapacity" – dominated the discourse during the two-day talks in Paris. Unilateral tariff measures have caused significant disruption to global trade and risk billions of dollars' worth of domestic costs in the US.

China's alarm over trade barriers stands in stark contrast to these factors. Beijing reveals a conscious desire to uphold the sanctity of the World Trade Organization (WTO), which has previously ruled that US Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods violate WTO rules.

This rules-based appeal also prioritizes established legal channels that firmly distinguish unilateral measures from issues that merit genuine economic concern. From where things stand, doing away with controversial US Section 301 tariffs can further expand the wide-ranging space for economic common ground between the US and China.

Potential is shown in constructive exchanges across a host of areas. These include tariff arrangements, investment pathways, and economic issues of joint concern. With these outcomes providing a much-needed hedge against global uncertainty, the US would be well-advised to rethink controversial Section 301 "investigations" and create more space for meaningful bilateral progress.

Even a cursory glance suggests that the common ground is up for the taking. Nearly 120 Chinese company projects are likely to take shape in US exhibitions this year. Moreover, China's trade with the US has already accumulated hundreds of billions in Chinese yuan (RMB), underlining resilience and multisector strength. With both sides ahead of Trump's highly anticipated visit to China, there is ample reason to reconsider applying negative measures against China.

Given that Beijing has urged Washington to completely eliminate these unilateral levies, the onus is on Washington to meet Beijing halfway and work together to lay the groundwork for the stable development of bilateral ties.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)