Can Hainan's expo set a new template?

Editor's note: Yasir Masood, PhD, is a Pakistani political and security analyst, academic, and broadcast journalist specializing in strategic communication. He holds a PhD in International Relations, with a focus on conflict transformation in Balochistan. His work spans South Asian geopolitics, Pakistan's foreign policy, US-Pakistan relations, China's Foreign Policy, the Belt and Road Initiative, and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. He frequently provides commentary to global media and think tanks. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

The Sixth China International Consumer Products Expo (CICPE) is underway from April 13 to 18, in Haikou, China's southern province of Hainan. This year's expo can be seen as a major policy laboratory for the Hainan Free Trade Port, as its island-wide special customs operations were fully launched in December 2025. Beyond the impressive numbers, this commentary aims to examine the significance of this exhibition under the macro context of the 15th Five-Year Plan (FYP) period (2026–2030), announced last month in Beijing.

So the fundamental question this piece seeks to answer is: Who benefits from this expo, and why does the timing of such events matter more than ever? This is when certain countries have started weaponizing protectionism and decoupling as tools in an era of intense geopolitical tensions, trade disruptions and unequal growth, coupled with a dwindling economic structure under the shadow of horrific war within West Asia.

Despite this, China has been quietly rewriting its diversified growth model through incremental yet consistent opening up, even as certain countries turn inward. In my view, Beijing has broadly broken down the expo's shift from event-based opening to system-based economic engineering into four policy layers: institutional opening up, demand-side rebalancing, innovation commercialization and geopolitical signaling through managed interdependence. Let us walk through each.

First, the numbers speak volumes about the efficacy of the "institutional opening up" through CICPE in Hainan. International exhibits account for 65% of displays, a 20% jump from last year, including more than 200 products making global or Asia-Pacific debuts, doubling the 2025 figure. In addition, Russia and Bulgaria are setting up national pavilions for the first time, indicating that, instead of retreating from globalization, Beijing is deliberately counter-programming to mitigate the blowback from current global trade disruptions.

That strategy is playing out in Hainan, which, as an experiment in both geography and economic dividends, has been going great guns so far. For instance, the zero-tariff list now covers over 6,600 items, and goods with 30% value-added in Hainan can enter the mainland tariff-free. Thus, it operates as a structured intermediary between global supply and Chinese demand, reducing friction through institutional design.

The customs operations regime – the "first line" tariff-free access from overseas and the "second line" standard oversight to the mainland – is now fully in place. As a result, foreign worker numbers rose 90%, and inbound tourism jumped 53.1% in the first quarter, with the UK and Italy up by 81% and 101%, respectively. Moreover, foreign capital utilization rose nearly 20% in 2025, and newly registered foreign-funded enterprises grew 13% in January 2026 alone.

Second, China is focusing on "demand-side rebalancing" through CICPE. This simply means that it is prioritizing household spending rather than relying solely on traditional exports and investment as the key drivers of growth. This rebalancing act serves the dual purposes of strengthening domestic demand while shielding the economy from external shocks. The results of this policy shift are already visible, especially when Chinese consumers have direct access to global debut products at duty-free prices.

In the first two months of 2026, retail sales of consumer goods rose 2.8%, while Hainan's offshore duty-free sales jumped 25.7% year-on-year in the first quarter, reaching 14.21 billion yuan (around $2.08 billion). Openness to global competition enables the purchase and development of high-quality products and services. The health exhibition area at the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA), featuring 120 international pharmaceutical and medical device companies, and Hainan's new free pilot zone for medical tourism, follow the same logic. The idea is to use openness and competition from imported products and services to upgrade domestic consumption and shift toward an export-integrated service model.

The third objective of the expo is "innovation commercialization," which builds on the macro context clearly outlined in the 15th FYP: innovation-driven modernization, green transformation and macroeconomic resilience.

Notably, China's research and development (R&D) spending reached roughly 3.9 trillion yuan in 2025, about 2.8% of GDP. But beyond achieving scale, Beijing is now diverting R&D resources toward commercially viable outputs. This is evident in the expo's "global debut" focus on flying cars, intelligent robots and smart transit systems, representing the downstream expression of that shift, where pilot zones and procurement systems accelerate market entry.

This innovative business model stands in contrast to global practices, where developed states mostly commercialize innovation through private capital markets. In comparison, China uses state-guided platforms like Hainan to compress the time from R&D to market.

Fourth, geopolitical signaling through "managed interdependence" is unfolding as advanced economies like Canada and Europe continue to engage with China to ease pressure from US-led deglobalization. Beijing is pursuing controlled economic pragmatism, as in Hainan, by incorporating external firms directly into end-user demand ecosystems – beyond just supply chain partnerships.

The most revealing signal is Canada as this year's guest of honor: a 400-square-meter pavilion and nearly 40 Canadian companies spanning cosmetics, agricultural products and health supplements. For Beijing, this signals to advanced economies that participation in China's consumer system does not require strategic alignment because firms can create a win-win proposition while converging commercially. For Canada, Hainan functions as a controlled entry point into the world's second-largest consumer market.

To reinforce this managed interdependence in Hainan, events like the BFA provide the blueprint for development, security and governance, while CICPE provides business partnerships. Yet the real question remains whether managed interdependence can remain stable when geopolitical competition intensifies – or whether it will eventually lead to economic decoupling.

That uncertainty aside, the expo's immediate results are clear. So who benefits? Global brands, Chinese consumers, Hainan and the wider region. Why does the timing matter? Because while others retreat into protectionism, the CICPE shows that engineered openness works – under the 15th FYP and across all four policy layers outlined here. It is proof that China can turn domestic consumption into a driver of global cooperation, and Hainan is not an exception; it is the new template. 

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)