By continuing to browse our site you agree to our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.
Editor's note: CGTN's First Voice provides instant commentary on breaking stories. The column clarifies emerging issues and better defines the news agenda, offering a Chinese perspective on the latest global events.
Have you ever heard a story like this? A project is on the verge of being cut, and suddenly its managers start scrambling for justifications – stretching arguments, even "manufacturing" them if necessary – just to prove it's still indispensable. The National Endowment for Democracy, a US institution that has long branded itself as "non-governmental," yet has been widely associated with advancing US government interests abroad through political interference, destabilization efforts, and support for regime change, is now caught in the squeeze of funding, politics, and its own survival. In that pressure, its narrative has grown increasingly hardline, to the point where being "anti-China" is no longer just a stance, but a tool for sustaining its own existence.
(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on Twitter to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)
Editor's note: CGTN's First Voice provides instant commentary on breaking stories. The column clarifies emerging issues and better defines the news agenda, offering a Chinese perspective on the latest global events.
Have you ever heard a story like this? A project is on the verge of being cut, and suddenly its managers start scrambling for justifications – stretching arguments, even "manufacturing" them if necessary – just to prove it's still indispensable. The National Endowment for Democracy, a US institution that has long branded itself as "non-governmental," yet has been widely associated with advancing US government interests abroad through political interference, destabilization efforts, and support for regime change, is now caught in the squeeze of funding, politics, and its own survival. In that pressure, its narrative has grown increasingly hardline, to the point where being "anti-China" is no longer just a stance, but a tool for sustaining its own existence.
(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on Twitter to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)