Editor's note: David Gosset, a special commentator for CGTN, is a specialist in global affairs and sinology and the founder of the China-Europe-America Global Initiative. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.                     

A quiet but measurable shift is underway in American public opinion. According to a recent Pew Research Center survey, 27% of Americans now report a favorable view of China, a six-point rise in a year and nearly double the level recorded in 2023. That figure is still modest, but the direction matters. It suggests that, beneath the surface of geopolitical rivalry and political rhetoric, perceptions are adjusting to structural realities that are increasingly difficult to ignore.

At the core of this shift lies economics. For all the talk of "decoupling," the United States and China remain deeply intertwined. Over the past several years, China has demonstrated a notable degree of resilience under pressure: Trade frictions, technological restrictions and geopolitical tensions have not derailed its broader economic trajectory. Instead, Beijing has diversified export markets, strengthened industrial supply chains and moved up the value ladder in key sectors. The result is a system that is less vulnerable to external shocks and more adaptable than many expected.

For American consumers, these macroeconomic dynamics translate into something very tangible: affordability and availability. Chinese manufacturing continues to supply a vast range of cost-effective goods, from electronics to household essentials, that remain embedded in everyday life in the US.

Attempts to artificially sever these ties run into a basic constraint – market logic. Substituting entire supply chains is neither quick nor cheap, and the costs are ultimately borne by businesses and consumers. This creates a quiet but powerful form of recognition: Regardless of political narratives, China's role in the global economy is functional, not optional.

That recognition is increasingly reflected in attitudes within the US business community. Many firms, particularly those with global exposure, have shifted toward a more pragmatic view of China. The idea of wholesale decoupling is widely seen as impractical, even counterproductive. Instead, companies are recalibrating by diversifying where necessary, but maintaining engagement where it remains beneficial.

This pragmatic approach is gradually filtering into broader public consciousness, where economic self-interest tends to temper ideological rigidity. In this sense, improving perceptions of China are less about persuasion than about lived experience.

Beyond economics, a geopolitical dimension is also shaping China's evolving image. In a world marked by fragmentation and conflict, China has positioned itself as a stabilizing force and a facilitator of peace. Its emphasis on sovereignty, non-interference and negotiated solutions resonates in regions fatigued by interventionist policies. Mediation efforts in regional disputes, alongside a consistent call for dialogue over confrontation, contribute to an image of predictability, continuity and moderation.

This perception is sharpened by a striking contrast. The US, while still a dominant global power, is increasingly viewed both abroad and by segments of its own public as politically polarized and strategically inconsistent. Policy swings across administrations on issues as significant as climate change and multilateral institutions, abrupt shifts in trade and foreign policy, and domestic turbulence all contribute to a sense of unpredictability. Against that backdrop, China's long-term planning, as reflected in initiatives such as its five-year plans, and its policy continuity appear comparatively reassuring, even to observers who do not necessarily align with its governance model.

Technology and culture add another dimension. China's advances in fields such as artificial intelligence, renewable energy, telecommunications and electric vehicles are no longer peripheral; they are central to global competition. These are not abstract achievements; they manifest in products, platforms and infrastructures that people interact with directly.

At the same time, Chinese cultural exports, from digital entertainment to consumer brands, are gaining incremental traction internationally. Alongside this shift, a more subtle narrative is emerging – one of a "cool China," increasingly associated with novelty, experimentation and forward-looking creativity. While these cultural expressions may not yet match the global reach of American pop culture, they nonetheless contribute to a growing perception of China as a source of newness and innovation, not just manufacturing.

What makes the recent uptick in favorable views particularly notable is that it occurs despite the persistence of predominantly Western narratives about China, many of which emphasize rivalry, risk, threat and systemic difference. In other words, perceptions are improving even without a fundamentally transformed media environment. This suggests that structural factors such as economic interdependence, geopolitical positioning and innovation are beginning to outweigh narrative framing.

Looking ahead, this trend could approach an inflection point. If China continues to deliver steady economic performance, expand its technological footprint and position itself as a reliable actor in an uncertain world, its "hard power" assets may increasingly reinforce its "soft power" appeal. The two are often treated as distinct, but in practice they interact: Economic relevance shapes cultural curiosity, technological leadership enhances perceived legitimacy and geopolitical stability fosters trust.

That does not necessarily imply a linear or uncontested rise in global favorability. Skepticism, strategic competition and value-based differences will remain significant constraints, particularly in the US and among its allies. Public opinion is also volatile and sensitive to crises and political framing. Yet the recent data points to something more durable than a short-term fluctuation. It reflects a gradual alignment between perception and reality, an acknowledgment that China's role in the world is not only substantial, but structurally embedded.

In that sense, the shift from skepticism to recognition may mark the beginning of a broader recalibration – not a convergence of systems, but a more grounded understanding of interdependence. From this foundation, China's global image shaped as much by performance as by narrative may continue to gain traction in ways that are incremental, pragmatic and potentially irreversible.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)