Editor's Note: Xin Ge, a special commentator for CGTN, is a research fellow at the Institute of Public Policy and Governance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (SUFE), and a chair associate professor at the School of Public Administration and Policy, SUFE. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

Western media outlets such as Reuters and The Wall Street Journal keep asking the same question: Can the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Chinese government really stick to a long-term plan? Skeptics doubt whether the country's signature five-year plans and central decision-making mechanisms can truly achieve what the Chinese describe as "drawing one blueprint to the very end."  

Such doubts say less about China's governance capacity than about a misunderstanding of the institutional logic behind the nation's transformation. The question is no longer whether China can adhere to its long-term plans; the evidence suggests it already does.

The historic achievements of Chinese modernization are not accidental. They reflect a deliberate philosophy of long-term and consistent implementation of successive five-year plans that have guided the nation's development since 1953.  

Look at the record. In 2021, China announced the eradication of absolute poverty, lifting nearly 100 million rural residents out of destitution over eight years and meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal on poverty reduction a full decade ahead of schedule.  

This was not a short-term relief effort or a politically timed welfare program; it was the culmination of decades of targeted planning, which identified and supported around 29.48 million impoverished households with tailored measures.

Infrastructure tells the same story. China's high-speed rail network surpassed 50,000 kilometers by the end of 2025, accounting for over 70% of the world's total high-speed rail mileage and exceeding the combined length of all other countries. The network now connects 97% of Chinese cities with urban populations exceeding 500,000, with commercial operating speeds of up to 350 km/h – the fastest regular commercial service in the world. Building this required sustained investment across multiple five-year planning cycles, transcending the short-term political calculations that often derail or defund mega-projects elsewhere.  

China's commitment to innovation is equally quantifiable. Research and development (R&D) expenditure surpassed 3.61 trillion yuan (approximately $500 billion) in 2024, growing 8.3% year-on-year, with R&D intensity reaching 2.68% of GDP – surpassing the EU average of 2.11% and approaching the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development average of 2.73%. Investment in basic research alone climbed 10.5% to nearly 250 billion yuan.  

What enables the CPC to keep "drawing one blueprint to the very end"? Part of the answer is institutional. The five-year plans provide a level of continuity and predictability that short electoral cycles in Western democracies often struggle to deliver. Each plan builds on its predecessor, so strategic priorities – technological self-reliance, ecological conservation, rural revitalization and common prosperity – remain consistent across decades rather than shifting with every change of administration.

But institutions alone do not explain it. The other part of the answer lies in how the system defines success. The CPC recently spoke of the "correct understanding of governance performance" – the idea that officials should be judged by their long-term contribution to people's livelihoods, not by flashy short-term projects designed to win the next election. Poverty alleviation was not simply an economic target to be checked off; it was a commitment that required deploying millions of grassroots officials to 128,000 impoverished villages.  

High-speed rail development was not just infrastructure spending to stimulate GDP; it was about connecting remote regions to economic opportunities and narrowing the gap between coastal and inland areas. Sustained R&D investment is not only about national prestige or technological rivalry; it is about creating quality employment and sustainable growth for future generations.

This people-centered approach means that China's long-term planning is no abstract exercise in technocracy, detached from the lived experience of ordinary citizens. It is, at its core, a practical, ongoing response to the needs of 1.4 billion people. When Western commentators question China's capacity for sustained strategic execution, they often overlook a basic fact: The CPC's ability to mobilize resources and accomplish large-scale undertakings stems from aligning long-term national planning with the everyday interests of the people it serves.  

The blueprints endure because they are inscribed in the fabric of daily life – new rail lines that shrink distances, better jobs that expand opportunity, cleaner energy that clears the skies and improved mobility that reconnects families and markets.

Using medium- and long-term plans to steer economic and social development is not simply a governance preference for the CPC; it is an institutional practice that China has relied upon for over seven decades. The blueprint endures because it is drawn not for the transient glory of politicians, but for the lasting prosperity of the nation and the well-being of its people. That is a reality that deserves acknowledgment, even from those who view China's political system with deep and abiding skepticism.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X, formerly Twitter, to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)