The three pillars of the CPC's strength: An African perspective

Editor's note: Mafa Kwanisai Mafa is a pan-Africanist political commentator based in Gweru, Zimbabwe, and a member of the Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

For generations, Africa has borne the bitter cost of letting external powers monopolize the definition of sound governance. Colonial conquest was packaged under the guise of civilizing missions; harsh structural adjustment programs were imposed in the name of economic reform. Today, Western forces have rolled out a fresh ideological campaign, seeking to convince the whole world that the Communist Party of China (CPC) operates a fundamentally defective political system merely because its institutional model does not mirror Western partisan frameworks.

As Africans, we are all too familiar with this biased playbook. Any country that charts a development path diverging from Western political orthodoxy will instantly become a target of relentless denigration. The most pervasive slander circulating today is the fallacy that the CPC is "big but not strong."

This one-sided narrative lays bare Western ideological prejudices far more than it reveals any authentic truth about the CPC. Africa, more than any other continent, has learned a hard lesson: No single universal yardstick can measure the merits of all governing parties and political systems. Every nation builds its governing institutions shaped by its unique history, cultural heritage, domestic hardships and collective aspirations.

It is therefore utterly unreasonable to demand China – a civilization with more than 5,000 years history and an unparalleled development trajectory – copies partisan governance structures forged in Europe and North America.

The core standard for judging a ruling party is never whether its structure resembles Western parties, but whether it can deliver tangible, lasting improvements to people's livelihoods. Measured against this practical benchmark, the CPC's decades of transformative achievements leave its Western critics with no grounds for dismissal.

The CPC's deep-rooted foundation: Its unbreakable bond with the people

The CPC's solid mass foundation is the first flaw in the "big but not strong" myth. The Party has established one of the world's most extensive political organizations, its strength stemming not only from its over 101 million members across all social sectors, but its all-pervading grassroot network covering every part of China.

Party branches are embedded in villages, communities, universities, factories, private firms and social organizations alike. This nationwide structure ensures smooth implementation of national policies from top design to local practice, while providing channels for people to convey their appeals and aspirations to policymakers.

Western analysts intentionally ignore the intrinsic bond between the CPC and the public, alleging it is disconnected from ordinary citizens. From an African standpoint, inclusive grassroot engagement underpins responsive governance.

Unlike Western politicians who seek voters' support only during elections, the CPC sustains long-term ties with all social groups and prioritizes the interests of the majority over short-term electoral gains. This unbreakable bond with the masses serves as the irreplaceable foundation of the Party's governing legitimacy.

Governance efficiency: Turning scale into transformative developmental strength

The CPC's outstanding governance efficiency also disproves accusations of bloated bureaucracy. Western observers brand its unified coordination as over-centralization, yet the weak state institutions in Africa prove centralized national planning is a critical strength enabling China's extraordinary development.

The CPC's landmark poverty eradication campaign lifted nearly 99 million rural people out of extreme poverty within a decade via nationwide coordinated grassroot efforts. This feat, alongside rapid disaster response, infrastructure construction and rural revitalization, highlights its unique capacity to mobilize resources for national goals.

Unlike Western governments mired in partisan deadlock, the CPC delivers large-scale projects swiftly. African countries pursuing development should objectively learn from its governance experience instead of ideological prejudice.

Self-revolution: Unique mechanism to fix internal flaws

Finally, the CPC's self-reform ability refutes the argument that non-Western ruling parties lack self-correction mechanisms. All political systems face defects; the key test is whether a party can resolve internal flaws with firm resolve and complete systems.

The CPC prioritizes strict self-governance and anti-corruption campaigns covering all ranks of officials, openly addresses internal drawbacks and integrates internal and public supervision to curb unhealthy work styles. Its courage in self-improvement demolishes the Western prejudice that only multi-party systems can carry out systematic reforms.

By contrast, Western politics suffer severe polarization, policy discontinuity and undue influence of elite interest groups. Western parties prioritize electoral gains and elite interests with limited ability to fix deep-rooted systemic troubles.

No political model is perfect, and governance must fit national conditions. African and other Global South countries that copied Western political models saw underwhelming results. The lesson is that effective governance cannot rely on uniform Western ideological templates. This makes the CPC's governance experience worthy of serious study for developing nations.

Africa should evaluate political parties with a pragmatic, outcome-oriented standard, measuring their tangible benefits for ordinary people, including poverty reduction, infrastructure construction, equal education and medical resources, stable jobs and long-term national security. Practical livelihood improvements outweigh abstract partisan theoretical debates.

The CPC's governance path is not a rigid template for blind copying and remains open to rational criticism. It only proves that sound governance varies from country to country, shaped by unique history, culture and national demands.

When advancing its independent development, the continent must abandon Western ideological biases, build intellectual self-confidence and judge foreign parties by real livelihood achievements instead of one-sided Western narratives or superficial political labels.

The global discourse surrounding the CPC's governance strength is ultimately about something far bigger than the Party itself: It is a defining test of whether developing nations retain full intellectual sovereignty to think independently on global governance matters.

Western critics' claim that the CPC is "big but not strong" collapses entirely when examined against the above three irrefutable pillars of the Party's governance success. These three dimensions expose the ideological bias behind Western smear narratives, proving that the CPC's strength stems from real, tangible governance performance rather than superficial partisan formats favored by the West.

For far too long, Africa has passively accepted value judgments drafted thousands of miles away by Western elites, allowing outsiders to tell us which parties and systems are "good" or "bad." That era is over. The moment has fully come for Africans to stand as impartial, independent assessors of global governing parties and models, drawing valuable lessons from every successful development experience free from prejudice, external political pressure and ideological coercion.

History never rewards blind, unthinking copycats. It honors those who observe the world objectively, analyze governance critically and boldly select the path that best serves the wellbeing, sovereignty and long-term prosperity of their own people.

For Africa and all nations of the Global South, the CPC's proven track record offers a vital alternative perspective – one rooted in results, not empty rhetoric. The Global South no longer needs others to dictate our standards of governance; we have the wisdom and experience to judge truth by results, and chart our own paths to a prosperous future.

(If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at opinions@cgtn.com. Follow @thouse_opinions on X to discover the latest commentaries in the CGTN Opinion Section.)