By continuing to browse our site you agree to our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.
A 2020 report by the Jamestown Foundation became a key source behind claims about Xinjiang's birth policies. But when you compare its analysis with the original government data, serious problems emerge – from a misreported demographic figure to the conflation of birth rates, natural population growth and policy targets. We examine how those errors shaped the report's misleading conclusions.
A 2020 report by the Jamestown Foundation became a key source behind claims about Xinjiang's birth policies. But when you compare its analysis with the original government data, serious problems emerge – from a misreported demographic figure to the conflation of birth rates, natural population growth and policy targets. We examine how those errors shaped the report's misleading conclusions.