The Federal Reserve took its first step on Wednesday to soften a key rule enacted
after the 2008 financial crisis to limit high-risk trading by banks.
The Fed, in
one of its first major moves under the leadership of President Donald Trump's
appointees, said it aimed to improve implementation of the Volcker rule on bank
trading to address criticism that the standards were vague and blocked important
services to bank clients.
But the proposed changes were largely panned by
progressive lawmakers and groups, who warned the changes could be planting the
seeds to another crisis.
The Fed is the first of five agencies that must approve
any change. The Volcker rule, included in the 2010 Dodd-Frank banking law and
implemented in 2013, bars banks from engaging in trading with their own funds,
or from running their own hedge funds to take big bets on investments.
The rule,
named for former Fed chair Paul Volcker, prompted large US banks to divest or
shut down high-risk, high-return businesses that are not supposed to enjoy the
benefit of federal deposit insurance.
But banks complained the measure wrongly
lumps in safe activities, such as those to hedge against risk, or those to
provide key liquidity to clients.
Volcker himself suggested some improvements in
the rule probably were merited, but cautioned against going too far to ease
restrictions.
"What is critical is that simplification not undermine the core
principle at stake – that taxpayer-supported banking groups, of any size, not
participate in proprietary trading at odds with the basic public and customers'
interests," Volcker said in a statement released by the Volcker Alliance, a
non-partisan good government group.
At a Fed board meeting to discuss the reform, officials said banks will
continue to be barred from trading with proprietary funds, but the changes would
clarify that some activities are permitted.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell said
officials involved with Volcker implementation see "many opportunities to
simplify and improve it in ways that will allow firms to conduct appropriate
activities without undue burden, and without sacrificing safety and standards."
"Our goal is to replace overly complex and inefficient requirements with a more
streamlined set of requirements," he said in a statement.
Rising risk?
Among
the proposed changes, the definition of "trading activity" would be modified to
permit more activities, including nixing the automatic classification of assets
held less than 60 days as short-term and subject to regulation.
Other changes
would provide relief to banks with smaller trading businesses, clarify that
certain kinds of market-making activities are allowed, and permit foreign
trading activities of non-US banks.
US officials said the toughest oversight
would fall on 18 giant banks with more than 10 billion US dollars in trading assets and
liabilities that account for about 95 percent of all trades.
About half are of
these banks are non-US. But the proposal drew immediate criticism in some
circles.
The changes will result in "more banks betting against, rather than
serving, their customers," the Center for American Progress said.
"This will
further concentrate the power of the largest banks in the markets at the expense
of all other investors, and it will put the economy and taxpayers at greater
risk of their failure."
Bart Naylor, a financial policy advocate at Public
Citizen, said easing up requirements on smaller banks made sense, but he was
generally troubled that policymakers appeared much more fixated on easing bank
requirements than on ensuring the bank system is safe.
"We're concerned that
this empowers banks to do what they want to do and that is gamble with funds
made cheap and available by taxpayers," Naylor said in an interview.
The Fed
proposal, which was developed in concert with four other agencies, will now be
subject to a 60-day public comment period.
Source(s): AFP