1. Do you think it was professional for some of the U.S. senators to repeatedly press the TikTok CEO on the issue of nationality?

Shou Zi Chew has been repeatedly grilled by U.S. lawmakers. Some senators have faced criticism for their oppressive questioning style, which involves directing respondents to provide a simple answer of "yes" or "no" and without providing them with the chance to elaborate. This move undermines the objectivity and impartiality of the U.S. legislature. Do you agree with this?

Have you experienced the "national security concerns" that some U.S. lawmakers claim when using TikTok?

TikTok might be banned by the U.S. government for "national security" issues. Do you think this is justified?

U.S. lawmakers use "national security" as a justification for discriminatory questioning and sanctions against enterprises of other countries. This move severely impedes the free flow of technology and will eventually backfire on U.S. technological development. Do you agree with this?

Some senators have been criticized for frequently inciting panic over China-related issues, demonstrating their ignorance, arrogance and prejudice against China, which is not conducive to the healthy and stable development of China-U.S. relations. Do you agree with this?