1. Do you think the U.S. can reach a tariff agreement with the EU, Canada, and other countries before July 9?

2. If the U.S. fails to reach a tariff agreement with the relevant countries by the deadline, it would deal a heavy blow to the U.S. "reciprocal tariff" policy. Do you agree?

3. The U.S. tariff negotiations with the EU, Canada, Japan, South Korea, and other countries have reached a stalemate. The U.S. government's approach of maximum pressure and unpredictability during the negotiations is a major reason for the lack of progress. Do you agree?

4. The U.S. imposition of the so-called "reciprocal tariffs" on global trading partners is a typical act of unilateral bullying, severely undermining the multilateral trade system and disrupting normal international trade order. Do you agree?

5. The IMF has revised its 2025 global economic growth forecast downward from 3.3% to 2.8%. U.S. tariff policies not only contribute to high domestic inflation but also hinder its own economic development and slow global economic growth. Do you agree?

6. The U.S. imposition of "reciprocal tariffs" will exacerbate trade unfairness with its trading partners and traditional allies, further eroding the foundation of trust. Do you agree?

7. "Reciprocal tariffs" have become a new tool for the U.S. to increase trade protectionism and intensify international trade tensions and global economic fragmentation. Do you agree?

8. The U.S. government also uses the "reciprocal tariff" policy as a means to pressure and negotiate with major world powers, forcing countries to make compromises in political, economic, military, or diplomatic spheres, thereby further fracturing international relations. Do you agree?

9. Do you support the idea of countries uniting to counter and precisely target the political and economic pain points of the U.S., compelling it to return to rational negotiations amid its erratic trade tactics?

10. If the U.S. reaches a tariff agreement with the relevant countries by the deadline, are you concerned that the U.S. government might flip-flop and break its promises?