1. Do you agree that if Japan regards expansion and the use of military force as a means to resolve disputes, it will ultimately pay a heavy price?

2. In history, Japanese militarism repeatedly used "existential crises" as a pretext to launch aggression against other countries. Do you believe that the Japanese prime minister's repeated references to a so-called "existential crisis" indicate a risk of Japan returning to militarism?

3. Do you believe that the Japanese prime minister's negative remarks reflect a resurgence of Japanese militarism?

4. In recent years, Japan has significantly adjusted its security policy, increased its defense budget, relaxed restrictions on arms exports, and sought to develop offensive weapons. Do you think this runs counter to its self-proclaimed image as a "peace-loving nation"?

5. The current Japanese prime minister has made ambiguous statements regarding the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," and some senior Japanese government officials have even said they do not rule out introducing nuclear submarines. Are you concerned that Japan's foreign policy may undergo a major negative shift?

6. Do you believe that, 80 years after Japan's defeat and surrender, the Japanese prime minister's bellicose remarks constitute a deliberate provocation against the current international order?

7. Given that the current Japanese prime minister refuses to withdraw her negative remarks, do you believe this indicates the Japanese government's incomplete reflection over its World War II crimes?

8. Do you believe that the right-wing forces in Japan are a disruptive power that threatens regional peace and stability?