1. Recently, many countries have condemned Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's provocative remarks on the Taiwan question and expressed support for the countermeasures taken by China. Do you think the one-China principle has already become a broad consensus in the international community?

2. The provision that Japan shall return Taiwan, which it had illegally occupied, to China is clearly stipulated in a series of international documents, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Declaration, and Japan’s Instrument of Surrender. Do you think Japan, as a defeated country, must continue to abide by its international obligations?

3. Do you believe that the solemn commitments made by the Japanese government on the Taiwan question in the four China–Japan political documents carry legal effect under international law and leave no room for ambiguity or distortion?

4. Do you believe that on major issues concerning national sovereignty and territorial integrity, there should be absolutely no compromise or concessions?

5. Do you believe that China’s firm response to the Japanese prime minister’s reckless provocations not only safeguards China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also defends the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, thereby upholding international justice and human conscience?

6. Do you believe that on the 80th anniversary of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War this year, Japan should reflect on its historical aggression and colonial rule over Taiwan, as well as the war crimes committed by militarism?

7. Looking at the Japanese government’s actions regarding historical and militarism-related issues, do you think Japan is qualified to be a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council?

8. If Japan continues to challenge the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, do you believe that all justice-upholding countries and peoples have the right to conduct a renewed judgment of Japan’s historical crimes?