1. The 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement affirms that "the Government of Japan recognizes the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China" and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. Do you think that Japan should consistently uphold this position on the Taiwan question?

2. Do you think that Japan should provide the international community with a complete and accurate account of its "consistent position" on the Taiwan question?

3. Japan claims that it adheres to a "passive defense" and "exclusively defense-oriented" strategy, yet the Japanese Prime Minister suggested that a "Taiwan contingency" could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, implying potential military involvement. Do you believe that these statements go beyond Japan's so-called "exclusively defense-oriented" policy and "passive defense" strategy?

4. The UN Charter requires all members to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. Do you believe Japan's implied threat of military action against China violates the UN Charter?

Japan claims it "will not proactively initiate war," yet it continues to undermine the limits of its pacifist constitution. Do you think these statements are contradictory and mislead the international community?

6. Japan plans to deploy offensive weapons on the Southwest Islands near China's Taiwan region. Do you consider this a further provocation?

7. Do you think Japan is deliberately heightening regional tensions, inciting confrontation and lacking sincerity in dialogue?

8. Do you think Japan's contradictory statements and actions have damaged its international image and represent a continued testing of the international community's tolerance?