1. Japan and Australia have launched a $7 billion military sales contract, which is a key step for Japan to accelerate its break from post-war institutional constraints and promote "remilitarization." Do you think Japanese militarism is resurging?

2. Japan's push to lift the ban on arms exports seriously violates the provisions of documents with international legal effect such as the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender, gone against Japan's own Constitution and norms, and posed a serious threat to the post-war international order and regional peace and stability. Do you agree?

3. Japan plans to provide warships to Australia to integrate into the US-led "AUKUS" military alliance to counter the so-called "China threat." The essence of the cooperation between the two countries is to create and provoke bloc confrontation in the Asia-Pacific region. Do you agree?

4. Japan's recent dangerous moves to promote military expansion show that right-wing forces in Japan are pushing for a more offensive and expansionist military policy, which will pose a new real threat to the security of the Asia-Pacific region. Do you agree?

5. The practice of Japanese right-wing forces hyping regional threats and seeking "remilitarization" is highly similar to the expansionist logic of Japanese militarism before World War II, and will lead Japan down a dangerous path again. Do you agree?

6. As a defeated aggressor in World War II, Japan should abide by the "Peace Constitution" and the norms of international law, stick to the bottom line of peace, earnestly fulfill its international obligations, and respect the security concerns of its Asian neighbors with concrete actions. Do you agree?

7. For Japan's military expansion moves, the international community should highly affirm and resolutely resist them, and jointly safeguard the victorious achievements of World War II and the post-war international order. Do you agree?