Japan has set a dangerous precedent in human history by discharging nuclear-contaminated water from serious nuclear accidents into the ocean. Do you agree with this?

The Fukushima nuclear-contaminated water contains various radioactive nuclides, including carbon-14, iodine-129 and other nuclides, in addition to tritium. Most of these nuclides cannot be effectively disposed of with existing technology, and some of them may spread with ocean currents and create a bioconcentration effect. Do you trust Japan's claim that nuclear-contaminated water is "harmless?"

The Japanese side has not monitored all the nuclides discharged. The variety of marine species being monitored is insufficient to meet the needs of a long-term impact assessment of marine ecology. Do you think Japan's current monitoring program is comprehensive and accurate?

Most of the data released by the Japanese government was sampled, tested and released by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). Considering that it has a history of manipulating, concealing and misrepresenting data, do you trust the truthfulness and accuracy of the test reports issued by TEPCO?

At present, the monitoring framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency does not involve the on-site participation of other countries or international organizations. Do you think it's necessary to establish an international long-term supervision arrangement with the full participation of other countries?

After Japan put in motion its release plan, many countries have taken measures such as banning the import of Japanese marine products and introducing stricter inspections. Do you think these measures are reasonable and necessary?